Client feedback

“It’s a pleasure working with key members of the PSGS team: their experience and leadership means that they know how to get the job done, working in partnership with fellow trustees, employers and advisers to achieve the best result for members.”

Mark Smith,

Partner at Taylor Wessing

“PSGS offered the right support at very short notice, at reasonable cost, when we really needed it.”

Ian Edwards,

Chair of Trustee, Comet Pension Scheme

“Very happy with service.”

Christine Morris,

Twyford Bathrooms

“The team provide an excellent service with practical and commercial input that we have not found with anyone else.”

Mark Culwick

“Appointing Kevin as KBC professional trustee was one of the best decisions the bank took. He complements the other two trustees and also appreciates the position of the employer too. The experience a professional trustee adds is invaluable and they can share their knowledge and market practice within the KBC plan. Kevin manages the budget in consultation with the bank, fully debriefs all parties and maintains a constant dialogue with myself (as HR Manager) and trustees. Since we have worked together for a number of years, Kevin also appreciates some of the limitations we face ie budgets, and always comes up with a proactive approach and solution. His input is particularly valued by the bank trustee who is an actuary in our pensions department in Belgium Head Office. ”

Sharron King,

KBC Bank

“I find Colin proactive rather than reactive. He is also supportive.”

Changing salary sacrifice – is there a cunning plan?

Topic:

Hot topic

Date published:

Tuesday, 3 May 2016

Author:

Kevin Clark

Concerned about the growth of salary sacrifice schemes (30% since 2010), the Chancellor has sent warning shots across the bows of salary sacrifice schemes in recent Budgets and Autumn Statements. We all wondered if there would be something bold in this year’s Budget…

The short answer is, there wasn’t! We still do not know exactly which benefits would be subject to a clampdown. However, it appears the government wants to encourage employers to offer certain benefits as the 2016 Budget report did state the review is not intended to affect salary sacrifice on pensions, childcare or cycle to work schemes.

Banning salary sacrifice for some benefits would certainly seem a simple way for the government to increase revenue through National Insurance contributions (NICs) and, in some cases, income tax. As it would impact both businesses and individuals, perhaps they have held off doing anything bold to the system right now – and avoided confirming the timing of any changes - because of the difficult economic conditions.

Benefits in kind, such as private medical insurance or dental cover obtained via salary sacrifice currently only attract NIC advantages (with the employee still subject to income tax on the value of the benefit). Other benefits, such as additional employee life assurance and income protection, better fit the description of attracting income tax and NIC advantages. Any could be a target, but we await further information from the Treasury.

The new lifetime ISA , LISA, throws in a bit of a curve ball as the product does not fit in with salary sacrifice. If LISAs do take off and some of the age and/or contribution restrictions are relaxed over time, standard pension contributions are likely to decline and with it the significance of pension salary sacrifice. I wonder if that is part of the Chancellor’s big plan?

Want to know more about the new lifetime ISA? Read our LISA blog

Back to opinions

Hot topics

‘ PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett ’

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

‘ Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market ’

Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

More opinions »