Client feedback


So much more proactive than the previous company. On the ball - thinking in advance of things needing doing - very proactive.
Paul Rudd ,
Chairman of Trustees, Express Newspaper
Edwin’s working to ensure the other trustees get involved. Last year he took more of a leading role, which I was very grateful for. He is well organised and proactive. Feedback from external advisers has been good.
Jeremy Barnard ,
Imerys
Claire offers a very approachable, professional and balanced service, recognising her obligations to the Scheme but providing an awareness of the Employer's perspective. We value Claire's wider industry knowledge and the experience she brings.
Competent, friendly and very helpful.
Very responsive to any queries we have and proactive in managing our scheme to the best. Very happy with the support we are getting.
Caroline Rand ,
Historic Royal Palaces
​Their pragmatic approach helps with quick and easy decision making. Another approach might have made things more difficult.
Mark Assinder,
Bouygues

The sole trustee shift

What do you think about sole trusteeship? A sensible, cost effective way of ensuring a pension scheme is well managed, or an option exposed to pitfalls?

Whatever your opinion may be now, sole trusteeship is becoming more popular each year. Clare Owen’s blog back in 2016 mentions 30% of our new enquiries being for a sole pension trustee. This year, it’s been closer to 50%. Most want a sole trustee now, but one-third are looking to transition from independent trustee board member or chair of pension trustees to a sole trustee after a year or two or three.

An immediate move to sole trusteeship is right for some – take the scheme we took on where the relationship between the trustee board and the pension scheme’s sponsoring employer had broken down. Decisions weren’t being made and risks were neither properly understood and appreciated nor being managed as well as they could/should have been. (Read the case study to find out more!)

For others, a transition to sole trusteeship is a great idea. It gives the existing pension trustees time to get comfortable with their new professional trustee – and, importantly, the independent trustee’s relationship with the pension scheme sponsor – pass on important knowledge about the pension scheme and its members and input their opinions on strategic direction. This helps mitigate some of those often-quoted pitfalls of sole trusteeship.

I shan’t go into all the pros and cons of sole trusteeship here – you can see it all on our video – but I can’t stress enough ‘sole’ doesn’t mean you’re reliant on one person and their views and links to membership aren’t necessarily lost. As a sole trustee to several pension schemes, I’ve seen first-hand how it can be a real benefit to improve efficiency, deliver better scheme management and help move scheme’s along their strategic path more swiftly.

If The Pensions Regulator (TPR) does decide all pension schemes should appoint a professional trustee, I imagine scheme sponsors will move more quickly to sole trusteeship as they seek to maximise value for money. Everyone will then need to become more comfortable with the approach.

 

 

Back to opinions

 

Hot topics


PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett
Hot Topic

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

Read more »


Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market
Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

Read more »


More opinions »


Call: 0118 207 2900

online enquiry