Client feedback

“Proactive in driving the agenda and leading the scheme on its logical journey.”

Caroline Rand,

Historic Royal Palaces

“Wish I'd had the opportunity to do the Trustee training course sooner! ”

Stuart Atkins,

Raleigh UK Ltd

“I would recommend them to anyone - I have dealt with a number of other independent trustee firms and would rate PSGS as the best. We are very happy with Mark and the service we get.”

Julia Morton,

Camellia plc

“Very responsive to any queries we have and proactive in managing our scheme to the best. Very happy with the support we are getting.”

Caroline Rand ,

Historic Royal Palaces

“I found the trustee training really beneficial, highly recommended. I am not a trustee, I represent the employer and I think it will be valuable for me in future, having a better understanding of the trustees' perspective.”

Dave Strain,

Royal Yachting Association

“As a pensions novice, I felt that the trustee training course gave me a good grounding.”

Will Court

Future of trusteeship and governance consultation response

Topic:

Hot topic

Date published:

Wednesday, 25 September 2019

PSGS supports The Pensions Regulator (TPR) in its drive to raise the standards of pension trustee knowledge and understanding and wholeheartedly agrees requirements should be more onerous for professional trustees.

However, we feel further legislation is too heavy a solution as it would add additional governance costs onto schemes and employers and put off lay trustees from undertaking the trustee role. The worst possible result for defined benefit (DB) schemes is to bring in the over regulation that has blighted defined contribution (DC) schemes over the last few years.

Read our full response to TPR's future of trusteeship and governance consultation below.

Download consultation response

Back to opinions