Client feedback

“In any major corporate transaction, time is of the essence. PSGS's pragmatic commercial approach helped us manage the pensions aspects of our group re-structure to ensure a positive outcome for all parties. ”

David Wilman,

CFO at Survitec Group

“PSGS were overall more professional than others.”

Paul Staniland,

Kier

“The trustee training course lecturers' explanations and willingness to answer questions were most valuable - even silly ones - although I have learnt there are no 'silly questions' that trustees should ask.”

Anonymous

“So much more proactive than the previous company. On the ball - thinking in advance of things needing doing - very proactive.”

Paul Rudd ,

Chairman of Trustees, Express Newspaper

“PSGS offered the right support at very short notice, at reasonable cost, when we really needed it.”

Ian Edwards,

Chair of Trustee, Comet Pension Scheme

“When requesting information by email, I have noticed that there is 'out of hours activity' to answer me. I regard this as a stand out 'above and beyond' - impressed.”

What independent trustees think of the CMA review

Topic:

Funding & investment

Date published:

Wednesday, 10 April 2019

In this Professional Pensions article, Wayne shares his views on the Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA) review into the investment consultant and fiduciary management markets. They have been interviewing some of the industry's leading independent trustees in this series on compulsory fiduciary management retendering.

Read Wayne's article here

Read the Professional Pensions report here

Back to opinions