Client feedback


Professional and forthcoming with support.
Martin Crees ,
Rabobank
Very happy with PSGS as an organisation and that opinion is derived from the performance of those that represent them.
Sean Hoyle,
Wightlink
They deliver above expectation when the scheme has a particular challenge.
Ian Edwards,
Comet
We chose PSGS because of the experience of the team and the feel of the relationship seemed the right fit.
Paul Staniland,
Chair of Governance Committee, Kier Group Pension Trustees
I work with Wayne and Kirsty. They really understand our business - they work with the company while retaining independence and ensuring compliance. They are a joy and pleasure to work with.
Neil McCawley ,
Ferguson plc
Where PSGS are appointed to act in conjunction with an existing body of trustees, we have found that they are quickly able to fit in well and gain the trust and respect of their co-trustees.
Duncan Buchanan,
Partner at Hogan Lovells

Pension scheme data: fundamentally important not a consulting opportunity

Topic:

Hot topic

Date published:

Friday, 10 May 2013

I do wonder why it needed the Pensions Regulator (tPR) to issue guidance and then to maintain focus on record-keeping before so many people seemed to recognise the vital importance of good, clean pension scheme data. When I started working in the pensions industry, data (and customer service) was one thing that we always focused on.

The idea of ‘quality’ data is therefore not new. It was one of the key issues highlighted by Raising Standards in Pensions Administration (now the Pensions Administration Standards Association), and pension scheme trustees and administrators should have wanted accurate records long before tPR started pressing for it. After all, without correct scheme data, benefit calculations, actuarial valuations and investment advice will all be inaccurate. Pensions could come into payment at the wrong time, with incorrect amounts being paid, and the level of member queries could be high. Data is fundamentally important.

In practice, the responsibility for ensuring scheme data is correct sits with many parties. The pension scheme administrator and trustees are obvious ones, but scheme members and the employer’s HR and payroll teams also play a significant role. If members want their correct pension paid on time, they can help make sure it happens by checking their pension scheme administrator holds the right information about them.

To a degree, all these parties have been guilty of creating the mess we now have – whether through ’cheap’ administration, insufficient investment in systems or the knock-on effect from the latest ‘improvement’ in the way administration teams or businesses were structured. We now need to ask ourselves how we move forward and improve data quality from here.

One thing I think we need to be clear about is that you should not need to pay high fees to get scheme records up to date. After all, trustees may have to refuse additional work if the cost is too high and that serves no-one’s best interest. However, initial cleansing work is only one part of the story.

We must also find better ways of capturing data and then ensuring it remains in good shape going forward. Reminding members of the importance of keeping trustees informed of changes to their personal circumstances is one small step in the right direction - and one that is easy for trustees to incorporate into their annual plan.

Ann Geer - Pension scheme secretary

 

 

Back to opinions

 

Hot topics


PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett
Hot Topic

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

Read more »


Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market
Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

Read more »


More opinions »


Call: 0118 207 2900

online enquiry