Client feedback


Professional and forthcoming with support.
Martin Crees ,
Rabobank
Claire offers a very approachable, professional and balanced service, recognising her obligations to the Scheme but providing an awareness of the Employer's perspective. We value Claire's wider industry knowledge and the experience she brings.
In my experience, not all professional trustees are able to cope with tricky or potentially confrontational situations. I find PSGS has massive experience in getting involved, earning the respect of others and resolving such issues. They get stuck in – they are a first rate team.
Katherine Dandy,
Partner at Sackers & Partners
Very broad, comprehensive trustee training course covering a wide range of topics. Excellent!
Tom Graham,
Star Group Pension Scheme
PSGS were overall more professional than others.
Paul Staniland,
Kier
Keen to assist and helpful.

Compliance, enforcement & penalties: a warning to trustees

With two new compliance and enforcement bulletins issued on the same day, the Pensions Regulator (tPR) is making it clear pension trustees who fail in their duties will face penalties. The topics covered in tPR’s statements were two core pension scheme governance requirements - the scheme return and the chair’s statement for defined contribution (DC) schemes.

They highlight a worrying lack of governance and understanding of trustee responsibilities for some smaller pension schemes (under 100 members). Trustees of these schemes are more likely to fail to comply, with many indicating they were not aware of the chair’s statement requirements.

Skeletons in the closet

If they are unaware of these very well-publicised requirements, what else is being overlooked?

The second case study given by tPR - a small scheme with an insurer and independent financial adviser (IFA) assisting the pension trustees with governance - does not surprise me. The trustees' excuse for not producing a chair’s statement was:

  1. They had been a pension trustee for a number of years and not had to complete a chair’s statement in the past!
  2. The insurer and their financial adviser had not told them about the requirement before they completed the scheme return!

This really is bad. Trustees cannot simply abdicate their responsibility for knowing the regulations. They should be keeping their trustee knowledge & understanding (TKU) up to date.

It makes me wonder whether there are many other schemes who stated on the scheme return they have completed a chair’s statement when they haven’t. Perhaps tPR will start asking pension trustees for a copy of their chair’s statements to check compliance.

But we don’t have the budget…

Employers with small schemes and tight budgets can be nervous of appointing a professional trustee who can help ensure penalty-free compliance and manage their scheme more effectively. Many see it as an additional layer of cost, which they believe they cannot afford. That’s not looking at the whole picture.

We act as professional pension trustee for a number of small schemes including those with under a 100 lives. Our remit includes managing scheme budgets and getting the best value out of advisers by focusing them on the key issues. This means scheme governance improves without increasing (and often reducing) the overall spend on advisory fees. Happy employer, happy regulator, happy scheme members!

 

 

Back to opinions

 

Hot topics


PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett
Hot Topic

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

Read more »


Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market
Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

Read more »


More opinions »


Call: 0118 207 2900

online enquiry