Client feedback


Excellent support leading fiduciary management tender and availability during difficult pandemic period. Pragmatic, helpful approach and lovely to deal with.
Mark Berry ,
RM
​They are very proactive and full of new ideas, they've brought better scheduling and better minute sets.
Paul Rudd,
Express Newspapers
Gillian and Curtis provide an excellent service to the trustees. They are approachable and possess a huge amount of knowledge. Everything appears to work smoothly which I am sure is due to the immense amount of work they do in the background to ensure all paperwork is available and up to date.
Ian Woods,
KGPT trustees
Gillian goes above and beyond, she is very responsive to the whole team and delivers outstanding work.
Wendy Stansfield,
Vector Aerospace
The trustee training course lecturers' explanations and willingness to answer questions were most valuable - even silly ones - although I have learnt there are no 'silly questions' that trustees should ask.
Anonymous
PSGS was chosen because of their knowledge of the subject and awareness of our particular schemes.
George Batho ,
Trustee, Lansing Linde

Meeting the DC pension scheme governance challenge

Topic:

Legal & governance

Date published:

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

The Pensions Regulator is currently consulting on a new regulatory framework for the governance and administration of occupational and contract-based defined contribution (DC) pension schemes.

Whilst I don’t think the consultation document itself tells us anything new - it reflects the various DC features and principles contained in earlier Regulator statements - I do think it highlights the potential scale of the governance challenge for smaller UK pension schemes.

The Regulator recognises that, with more time and resource available, larger DC schemes will find it easier to meet any new requirements; but the principles of good defined contribution scheme governance apply equally to all schemes. Enabling members to achieve a good outcome will require the same actions whether your scheme is big or small.

As an industry, we need to do something to help smaller schemes meet all the incoming requirements, and do it in a way that is cost effective. After all, a combination of the tough economic climate and the introduction of workplace pension auto-enrolment mean the pressure on employers and pension schemes has never been greater.

To me, the starting point must be an independent review of a scheme’s DC governance process. If gaps are found, we need to find light touch, pragmatic solutions to ensure the scheme can meet all aspects of the new defined contribution regulations. Critically, these solutions must be proportional to the size of the scheme, be easy to implement and simple to maintain into the future.

 

 

Back to opinions

 

Hot topics


PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett
Hot Topic

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

Read more »


Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market
Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

Read more »


More opinions »


Call: 0118 207 2900

online enquiry