Client feedback


Very responsive to any queries we have and proactive in managing our scheme to the best. Very happy with the support we are getting.
Caroline Rand ,
Historic Royal Palaces
Extremely personable and professional.
Kelly White ,
Tussauds
These days, Boards need real expertise on tap (with excellent back-up) to cope with a constantly evolving and more regulated environment. PSGS is geared to delivering that.
Ray Pygott,
Partner at KPMG LLP
So much more proactive than the previous company. On the ball - thinking in advance of things needing doing - very proactive.
Paul Rudd ,
Chairman of Trustees, Express Newspaper
Kat & Jason are very good at making it happen – they just take care of it.
Stephen Allaker ,
Bristol Myers-Squibb
I work with Wayne and Kirsty. They really understand our business - they work with the company while retaining independence and ensuring compliance. They are a joy and pleasure to work with.
Neil McCawley ,
Ferguson plc

Meeting the DC pension scheme governance challenge

Topic:

Legal & governance

Date published:

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

The Pensions Regulator is currently consulting on a new regulatory framework for the governance and administration of occupational and contract-based defined contribution (DC) pension schemes.

Whilst I don’t think the consultation document itself tells us anything new - it reflects the various DC features and principles contained in earlier Regulator statements - I do think it highlights the potential scale of the governance challenge for smaller UK pension schemes.

The Regulator recognises that, with more time and resource available, larger DC schemes will find it easier to meet any new requirements; but the principles of good defined contribution scheme governance apply equally to all schemes. Enabling members to achieve a good outcome will require the same actions whether your scheme is big or small.

As an industry, we need to do something to help smaller schemes meet all the incoming requirements, and do it in a way that is cost effective. After all, a combination of the tough economic climate and the introduction of workplace pension auto-enrolment mean the pressure on employers and pension schemes has never been greater.

To me, the starting point must be an independent review of a scheme’s DC governance process. If gaps are found, we need to find light touch, pragmatic solutions to ensure the scheme can meet all aspects of the new defined contribution regulations. Critically, these solutions must be proportional to the size of the scheme, be easy to implement and simple to maintain into the future.

 

 

Back to opinions

 

Hot topics


PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett
Hot Topic

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

Read more »


Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market
Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

Read more »


More opinions »


Call: 0118 207 2900

online enquiry